![gordon ramsay teaches cooking masterclass trailer gordon ramsay teaches cooking masterclass trailer](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/iCzTTyYWUIc/maxresdefault.jpg)
61 percent of White women with college degrees who voted for McAuliffe." "Youngkin’s victory among White women was fueled by 74 percent of those without college degrees who voted for him vs. I looked up the demographics of the the Virginia election and found this from the following website: Replies: I came back to this thread and against my better judgement I thought I'd make a quick reply. The issue of Mexicans, though there are a few nasty ones even up there, is not as major as the USA Southwest. Biden represent some sort of economic chimera for poor whites in Northern Michigan.
![gordon ramsay teaches cooking masterclass trailer gordon ramsay teaches cooking masterclass trailer](https://uploads-ssl.webflow.com/5e8f5614a438dde426002a6e/5ed775c25c2d8d86401d2f9c_gordon-ramsay-masterclass-review-1.png)
In the future, whites with money might flee America the way the middle-class fled Detroit or Flint leaving the working class Polish to the tender mercies of blacks. Whites flee fast & as that old land whale Michael Moore noted.Flint fell apart fast. Detroit & Flint are the future of America. However, as a Michigan-born expat I'll say this: However, whereas in Ontario the Natives are violent towards whites & whites are afraid of them those scrappy Finns of the UP are not intimidated by the Indians.
![gordon ramsay teaches cooking masterclass trailer gordon ramsay teaches cooking masterclass trailer](https://mlhmvq6amqed.i.optimole.com/9Yurtvc-dZDkbT2b/w:1200/h:528/q:auto/https://ideapod.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/masterclass-qa-gordon-e1551189878631.jpg)
Some hick Finns up there might want to sport BLM regalia so nobody thinks their hicks but the real troublesome/screwed minority are the Natives. How can the UP be a panhandle of Minnesota? It's culturally Northern Wisconsin. Beyond that, I’m not sure that much can be Michigan native here. I have said before that it might be helpful for boys to start later, so that they are older, on average, than their female peers. You’re not going to learn much about ancient Egypt by making a chicken mummy. I homeschool and teach small groups of students in a co-op setting, and even with large class sizes, boys just really struggle to do what, in the end, must be done. If I’m not mistaken, bookish boys have always been seen as somewhat effeminate. I appreciate your measured reply, and I’m sure there’s some truth in it.īut I think it is a mistake to assume that the female academic advantage is solely a function of modern schooling. The large classrooms mostly dominated by verbal education play both to women’s genetic and social advantage (verbal skills/communication), and early maturity and relative lack of physical energy (they can sit and study for longer.) Replies: missed most of this, but I think we can all agree that modern schooling generally favors women. Either make the states actually sovereign, or eliminate them entirely. If we truly wish to have states exercise meaningful sovereignty, then the 14th Amendment has to go and so do things like the 1st and 2nd Amendments (at least as applied to states).Īt the moment we have a bad mix of wrongheaded ideas. If we plan to use the 14th Amendment to strip states of autonomy to do things like ban some religions, then there is no point to having states at all. That contradiction is actually the source of my point about states being anachronistic. I would appear on one point to contradict myself because I say that states are anachronistic but that states were supposed to have more authority (which we have stripped from them). No Federal Rules but state rules would be fine. It merely was supposed to insure that religion was regulated by states, not the federal government. It was not supposed to create religious freedom at all. It is also apparent that the First Amendment was misunderstood. That was made up of whole cloth by Justice Marshall and should be eliminated in a new document. There is nothing in the Constitution, for example, that gives courts the power of judicial review. Much of the constitution is anachronistic: states, the electoral college, the 2nd Amendment, the 14th Amendment, most everything about the Senate, most everything about the Judiciary.